Saturday, March 29, 2008

Spring trend - Ladylike Lace and Ruffles

That's right, lace and ruffles are back in a big way this Spring - and you don't have to look like a five-year old at a birthday party or a stodgy Victorian lady when you sport these thoroughly modern yet romantic pieces!

Robert Rodriguez @ Bluefly


















Alvin Valley @ Bluefly



















Nanette Lepore @ Bluefly



















Yaya Aflalo @ Bluefly



















Michael Simon @ Nordstrom


















Catherine Malandrino @ Saks Fifth Avenue



















Joie ruffled tank @ Bluefly


















Juicy Couture @ Saks Fifth Avenue


















Pixie Hopkins ruffle front blouse @ Nordstrom



















BCBG Max Azria @ Nordstrom


















Yaya Aflalo "Compte" jacket @ Bluefly



















Robert Rodriguez eyelet skirt @ Nordstrom



















Yoana Baraschi @ Bluefly

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Fashion World, Forgive Me, for I have Sinned...

For some reason, I've been thinking a lot about this lately. Probably because I have nothing else to do on the over-crowded city bus than to stare at how other folks accessorize. What, you ask, have I been contemplating so thoroughly?


Coach "Hamptons" signature small hobo bag

The cache of the designer bag. I don't get it.

There, I've said it. The fashion gods will now descend from on-high and smite me with the razor-sharp heel of a four-inch Jimmy Choo stiletto. Okay, perhaps that was a tad over-dramatic.

So here's the thing: Every day, I see women from the ages of 12 to 75 schlepping their things around in monogrammed Louis Vuitton totes; badly-faked Chanel shoulder bags; and the exalted (gasp!) Coach clutch. Every now and then, I can appreciate the aesthetics of these things, though generally I am not one for carrying around a piece that's one big loud ad for its designer. And that's the thing. These bags seem to exist solely to shout "Hey! Look at me! I have had the honour of spending exorbitant amounts of cash on a bag that gives me the privilege of carrying around something attached to this designer's name!"

In some cases, I can understand the excitement, because occasionally a piece really is exquisite, and beautifully well made. But the thing is, in most cases (at least on the bus on which I ride daily) the pieces I'm talking about are simple and underwhelming - a solid black clutch, for example, or a boring monogrammed tote that every second woman on the bus seems to be carrying. So what are you paying for? The quality? Okay, so maybe Louis Vuitton only uses the finest stitching and the most resilient of fabrication techniques, but let's face it - a woman will get sick of her bag and spring for another one long before the seams start to come undone on one of these babies - and I'm guessing that the woman who springs for a designer bag is much more label and season-conscious than her no-name loving counterparts, switching up her bags much more often - so what's the point of putting down the price of some small developing island nations on a purse that will be briefly shown off and then banished to the depths of the closet? I contend that I can find a no-name purse that will work perfectly well for as long as I need it (or until I get tired of it : p); and will more aptly express my unique personality, for a fraction of the price that women pay for these designer treasures.

This all stems from a silly conversation that my co-workers and I had awhile back, now that I think about it. A group of young, fashion-forward ladies was gathered around my colleague's desk, fawning over her recently acquired Coach clutch (a tiny rectangle of nondescript black leather). I just couldn't understand. They turned on me then, eyeing my bright, turquoise faux-leather tote. "That's nice! Where did you get it?" Someone asked, clearly waiting for some name-dropping. And here's the thing - I was momentarily taken in by the label-mania, and was too embarrassed to admit to my bag's no-name status!

"Um, I forget, I got it a long time ago..."

Well, I love my turquoise bag, and now I'm here to stand up for it. I don't need a designer bag to express myself, because I'm about individuality, colour, creativity and my own personal style (at a reasonable price!). I won't have these things dictated to me by a designer, or stamped on my fashion soul with a cute little monogram.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

March winds, April showers...

Help Bring May FLOWERS!

This Spring, one of the prettiest trends I've noticed combines the statement-making boldness of big, graphic patterns with the femininity of flowers. Larger-than-life blooms are popping up on skirts, dresses and tops much faster than any real flowers are arriving here in the frozen North!
Because these pieces pack such a statement, they're best worn with simple, neutral complementing garments. Throw on one of these pieces, and you'll feel like Spring really is blossoming:

Tibi Pampleone @ Saks Fifth Avenue




















Joie floral tunic @ Neiman Marcus




















Theory "Fialda" top @ Saks Fifth Avenue




















Tibi tunic @ Neiman Marcus


















Marc by Marc Jacobs @ Nordstrom




















Michael by Michael Kors @ Nordstrom




















Milly "Newport" shift @ Neiman Marcus

















Phoebe Couture sheath dress @ Neiman Marcus

















Tibi "Lily Pad" dress @ Saks Fifth Avenue
























"Campo de fiore" sweater dress @ JCrew

Friday, March 21, 2008

Classic, Modern Floral Blouses

When you think about floral blouses, certain images tend to pop into your head:

1) The epitome of bohemian hippie chic, all embroidery and flowing, gauzy fabric OR
2) Your local librarian's granny blouse - starched, staid and high-necked

However, this Spring, floral blouses can be both classic and modern. Scroll on to check out some of my favourites.

Alvin Valley @ Bluefly




















Cake Couture @ Bluefly


















JCrew blouse



















Jak and Rae @ Bluefly




















Karanina @ Bluefly



















Mac and Jac wildflower blouse




















Sanctuary Clothing @ Dillards



















Banana Republic blouse



















Generra tunic @ Bluefly


















Gap short-sleeve floral blouse

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Signs of Spring

Well, it seems that the six-foot high snowbank in front of our house stubbornly refuses to trickle away before the official first day of Spring (today!). Sigh. As a consolation, here are a few beautiful, delicate pieces that, to me, herald that first heady moment of Spring when life returns.

Honeybee willow bangle @ Etsy.com



















Entwined willow necklace by Honeybee @ Etsy.com



















Vine and willow necklace by Honeybee @ Etsy.com

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Under the needle for beauty's sake

photo from the Honolulu Adviser

No, I'm not talking about botox or any other insidious anti-aging serums that thirty-something starlets head to Switzerland to partake of. I'm talking about something I'd never really encountered before an acquaintance of mine starting rubbing her dark, well-groomed eyebrows vigorously as we were chatting over coffee.

"I've got to get them done again soon..." she muttered.
"What? Your nails?" I asked, all innocence.
"No, these." She pointed to her arched brows.
"What, you need to get them plucked? Waxed? Threaded?" I ventured.
"No. Tattooed."

Huh. Now, I've heard distant tales of women going under the tattooist's needle to permanently imprint their favourite cosmetic embellishments onto their faces...but I'd never actually seen the evidence in person. My friend's eyebrows were quite nice, and perfectly arched - but then again, she has black hair, and the dark brows matched her look. She used to be a blonde, and heaven knows what she'll do should she ever decide to go back.

This is my key point of contention with the whole idea. You can't go back. At least, you can't go back without an enormous amount of pain, effort, and cash. Imagine - there you are, in the height of the eighties, rockin' out your electric blue liquid liner and the streaks of bubble-gum blush across your cheekbones. "Hey," you think to yourself, admiring your own genius, "why don't I spend an hour getting semi-permanent ink shot under my skin by tiny, jabbing needles so I never need to spend an hour getting ready in the morning again?"

Weeelllll...as the eighties gave way to the nineties, and the new millenium took wing, I'm sure that in retrospect that flash of brilliance has faded - just as (hopefully), the permanent blue liner and shocking pink blush has.

Being stuck in the past isn't the only adverse effect of permanent makeup. A recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine (Straetemans & Marmur, 2007) discovered that a number of women were experiencing negative medical reactions to these treatments - suffering allergic reactions, infections, and developing lumpy, bumpy keloid scars.

Now, here's another thing: as much as it would be nice to roll out of bed on Monday morning and not have to spend any significant amount of time prettifying, do you really want to roll out of bed every morning with your eyeliner on and your lipstick perfectly applied? Do you want to look the same eating a bowl of cereal in your pj's as you do in your power suit at an interview? Do you want to always be primped to perfection? Imagine going camping, or simply waking up beside your beloved on a lazy Sunday morning - with your inevitable mask of makeup on.

There are some cases where I think the procedure is justified and can produce great results. Some women, for example, don't have the mobility or strength necessary to do their makeup every morning. And frankly, I've seen some impressive inked-on eyebrows in my time, and they almost make me jealous.

But really, is it worth it to go under the needle for most women? Frankly, I'll spend the ten minutes it takes to throw on some blush, gloss and liner in the mornings and skip the ink.

Friday, March 14, 2008

It Was The Best of Shoes, It Was the Worst of Shoes - Part Two

When I first started looking longingly at Spring shoes, I didn't really intend to divide my efforts between the good, the bad and the ugly. I was simply looking for my faves to share with my small but loyal readership! Yet, my eyes kept straying to a few pairs that...well...did absolutely nothing for me. In fact, the very thought of having them strapped on my feet made me shudder. These were shoes that I found so unattractive that it was entertaining. Consequently, I figured I'd share them with you! Hey - to each their own. If you happen to either lust after or own any of these - more power to you. Fashion is a subjective sport. But to me, I'd rather wander barefoot than subject my feet to these!

1 - Chie Mihara gladiator sandals @ Nordstrom - chunky, clunky and clashy



















2 - Dolce & Gabbana tapestry pumps @ Bluefly - looks like they were made from my Grandma's curtains

















3 - Suede pumps @ Spiegel - so chunky and ungraceful


















4 - Stella McCartney @ Neiman Marcus - made from those hideous plastic bracelets we all made in grade 8


















5 - Spiegel Studded Buckle Pumps - The metal toe plate is sooo feminine


















6 - Fendi Cage Heel Sandals @ Neiman Marcus - Nothing like a chain link heel















7 - Giuseppe Zanotti @ Neiman Marcus - Because I've always wanted a fish carcass on my feet


















8 - Prada "Decolette" pumps @ Bluefly - Drab colour and garish logo plate equals ugly


















9 - Prada @ Bluefly - Looks like an 80's pageant queen threw up on these


















10 - Miu Miu
pumps @ Saks Fifth Avenue - A floral flub

















What do you think? Personally, I'd rather walk over hot coals than walk out of my house in these! Hope you've enjoyed the good, the bad and the ugly of Spring shoes (so far!). As I'm sure you'll identify with, I'm always on the hunt for shoes - so I imagine more of my favourites (and least favourites!) will pop up soon!

It Was The Best of Shoes, It Was the Worst of Shoes...

Something about the impending shift in seasons (really! some day all this snow WILL melt!) has me dreaming of the distant day when I'll be able to strap on peep-toe pumps instead of schlepping on my hideous salt-stained snow boots. As a result, I've been scoping out some Spring shoes on my favourite sites. Here, in a totally random and un-scientific survey of what I've discovered, are my top ten most (and least) favourite Spring shoes (so far!). Enjoy, and dream of the day when you can step out in these without fear of sinking ankle-deep into a slush puddle!

The Favourites

1. Dior "Diorissimo" suede peep toes @ Bluefly - gorgeous details in a neutral hue



















2 - N.Y.L.A. "Stephie" pumps @ Bluefly - pretty pleated details in chocolate suede



















3 - Bottega Veneta pumps @ Bluefly - contrast stitching adds interest and definition


















4 - Cole Haan @ Bluefly - patent leather in a luscious ruby hue



















5 - Via Spiga "Opal" pumps @ Nordstrom - a bright kick of colour



















6 - Linea Paolo "Sofia" pumps @ Nordstrom - Such pretty, feminine details in a perfect cotton-candy shade



















7 - Gucci Mary Janes @ Saks Fifth Avenue - A shade sooo reminiscent of Spring leaves
















8 - Theory pumps @ Bluefly - A classic made special by the python texture


















9 - Martinez Valero "Whisper" pumps @ Nordstrom - polka dots kick any outfit up a notch



















10 - Jeffrey Cambell "Mai" pumps @ Nordstrom - A shade of ocean blue perfect for Spring




















I hope you've enjoyed this eye (and foot) candy as much as I have! Coming up - part two: the worst of shoes...